So, People-icans. Today, July 5th, 2011. Justice was served. Just kidding, it was a lie! Justice was indeed not served. If the court was taco bell, I would not have gotten my dog food taco. And I love those tacos, no matter what the health people say.
So, in all seriousness, I say this: What the freak?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
First off, I'd like to say to the jury. Where you awake during the trial? Or were you sleeping with your eyes open? Because, how did the verdict pronounce the guilty as innocent? Did you not hear the defense?
*DRAMATIZATION*
-defense- "Okay, guys. First, Caylee drowned. AND we blame the parents."
-good guys- "But defense, why was she in the forest in a bag with ducttape?!"
-defense- "I tell you this..... the meter man...."
-good guys - "The meter man?"
-defense- "Yes. The meter man. He went... and took her body and put it there!"
- good guys to the meter man - "Do you know these people and have you ever been in their home."
- meter man - "No, never."
- defense - "Oh but he did it. The baby drowned and he took her!"
Okay... so first the baby happened to drown because she was alone and not being watched. Good parenting, someone deserves mommy of the month! But, my question is.... if the baby drowned, why not call the police? Why would a baby that accidentally drowned end up in a swamp.... And why did she happen to have a little heart sticker residue on the ductape, similar to those in the home of Casey Anthony? And why.... were searches for chloroform on the computer?
-defense - "well, Cindy said she was trying to search chlorophyl, but she couldnt spell it, thereform the harsher chemical... came up. Yes, that's what happened."
Oh, okay. So... a nurse can't spell chlorophyl... and she so brutally misspells it that somehow... some m's and f's just weave in there. I didn't know we were searching for chlorofplym. I just happened to forget the phlegm when I pronounced it. OOPSIE! But I'm sure it must be hard on Cindy. You lose your granddaughter, and I'm sure she wants to protect her daughter. Still....
So, now we go to the nanny. She was the original person accused of taking Caylee. So, you may be thinking. That sounds reasonable, I can understand that. However, what if I just reword it a little.
The baby was taken by a figment of Casey's imagination. Ah? That still make sense? NO! It doesn't make any sense! Nor does the fact that when Casey "disappeared", a month passed before any call was made.
OH! But she probably thought the baby was on a prologned play date. You know how play dates can get. One minute it's only for half an hour, next thing you know they wanna play for a month. Yes... definetely. What kid wouldn't want to have a month long play date!?
So, now im going to journey back to the internet searches. Let's say that Cindy's statement that SHE made those searches, isn't true. That it was Casey. Now, if you had no bad intentions for this search... why would you be searching for such a substance? Now, some people may try and come up with anything that could change the fact that something so bad has occured. They may say: Maybe they needed help sleeping, and NYQUIL just doesnt work like a good old rag to the face. Cause everyone is SO FREAKING TIRED OF NORMAL MEDICINES! THEY JUST DON'T WORK! But really, yes... I searched how to break necks and about "knock out substances" out of pure curiousity. In no way to I plan to do ANYONE harm.
....Okay. Not.
So, continuing on. Casey also borrowed a shovel from her neighbor? Hmmm, planting some flowers there, are ya? But... wasn't she supposed to be spending the night with the nonexistent nanny?
So... all in all. I think that everything was pretty far fetched, and that it was pretty impossible to think that she couldnt have done it. Yet, they did. So, sidenote.
While a little baby is dead, the defense is having a champagne party. They arent trying to think on who could have killed the baby since Casey is "innocent". They aren't sad because yes a baby is dead. They are celebrating because they have allowed someone who shouldnt have been innocent, to walk. A compulsive liar who we know didn't like being a mother, who partied while her daughter was with a "nanny", and whose little daughter had fatigue marks on her eyes when she shouldnt have, walks free. It is indeed a sad day, when something so plain is not seen. Some may say that the prosecuters didn't prove without a reasonable doubt, but can they really say a defense whose theories and ideas were unreliable and who had a lawyer (Jose Baez) who was repeatedly scolded and reprimanded, proved that Casey was innocent. Justice was not brought, and that is an extremely ugly truth.
So, in all seriousness, I say this: What the freak?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
First off, I'd like to say to the jury. Where you awake during the trial? Or were you sleeping with your eyes open? Because, how did the verdict pronounce the guilty as innocent? Did you not hear the defense?
*DRAMATIZATION*
-defense- "Okay, guys. First, Caylee drowned. AND we blame the parents."
-good guys- "But defense, why was she in the forest in a bag with ducttape?!"
-defense- "I tell you this..... the meter man...."
-good guys - "The meter man?"
-defense- "Yes. The meter man. He went... and took her body and put it there!"
- good guys to the meter man - "Do you know these people and have you ever been in their home."
- meter man - "No, never."
- defense - "Oh but he did it. The baby drowned and he took her!"
Okay... so first the baby happened to drown because she was alone and not being watched. Good parenting, someone deserves mommy of the month! But, my question is.... if the baby drowned, why not call the police? Why would a baby that accidentally drowned end up in a swamp.... And why did she happen to have a little heart sticker residue on the ductape, similar to those in the home of Casey Anthony? And why.... were searches for chloroform on the computer?
-defense - "well, Cindy said she was trying to search chlorophyl, but she couldnt spell it, thereform the harsher chemical... came up. Yes, that's what happened."
Oh, okay. So... a nurse can't spell chlorophyl... and she so brutally misspells it that somehow... some m's and f's just weave in there. I didn't know we were searching for chlorofplym. I just happened to forget the phlegm when I pronounced it. OOPSIE! But I'm sure it must be hard on Cindy. You lose your granddaughter, and I'm sure she wants to protect her daughter. Still....
So, now we go to the nanny. She was the original person accused of taking Caylee. So, you may be thinking. That sounds reasonable, I can understand that. However, what if I just reword it a little.
The baby was taken by a figment of Casey's imagination. Ah? That still make sense? NO! It doesn't make any sense! Nor does the fact that when Casey "disappeared", a month passed before any call was made.
OH! But she probably thought the baby was on a prologned play date. You know how play dates can get. One minute it's only for half an hour, next thing you know they wanna play for a month. Yes... definetely. What kid wouldn't want to have a month long play date!?
So, now im going to journey back to the internet searches. Let's say that Cindy's statement that SHE made those searches, isn't true. That it was Casey. Now, if you had no bad intentions for this search... why would you be searching for such a substance? Now, some people may try and come up with anything that could change the fact that something so bad has occured. They may say: Maybe they needed help sleeping, and NYQUIL just doesnt work like a good old rag to the face. Cause everyone is SO FREAKING TIRED OF NORMAL MEDICINES! THEY JUST DON'T WORK! But really, yes... I searched how to break necks and about "knock out substances" out of pure curiousity. In no way to I plan to do ANYONE harm.
....Okay. Not.
So, continuing on. Casey also borrowed a shovel from her neighbor? Hmmm, planting some flowers there, are ya? But... wasn't she supposed to be spending the night with the nonexistent nanny?
So... all in all. I think that everything was pretty far fetched, and that it was pretty impossible to think that she couldnt have done it. Yet, they did. So, sidenote.
While a little baby is dead, the defense is having a champagne party. They arent trying to think on who could have killed the baby since Casey is "innocent". They aren't sad because yes a baby is dead. They are celebrating because they have allowed someone who shouldnt have been innocent, to walk. A compulsive liar who we know didn't like being a mother, who partied while her daughter was with a "nanny", and whose little daughter had fatigue marks on her eyes when she shouldnt have, walks free. It is indeed a sad day, when something so plain is not seen. Some may say that the prosecuters didn't prove without a reasonable doubt, but can they really say a defense whose theories and ideas were unreliable and who had a lawyer (Jose Baez) who was repeatedly scolded and reprimanded, proved that Casey was innocent. Justice was not brought, and that is an extremely ugly truth.
